Editorial policy

Curious Training Guide aims to make practice easier to think about, not to prescribe a single route to improvement. We explain our editorial approach and how we handle changes to published material.

Accuracy and clarity

We take care to distinguish established definitions, common approaches and our own interpretation. Writers should use reliable, relevant sources where factual claims need support, and explain terms plainly. We avoid unsupported guarantees and make uncertainty visible when the available information does not settle a question.

Independence

Editorial decisions are made for reader relevance and clarity. A commercial relationship does not determine our conclusions, and we do not present promotion as independent editorial coverage.

Corrections and updates

Readers can use the Contact page to flag a possible error. We review specific, actionable reports and correct material when warranted; significant changes should be made clear in the relevant article. We may also revise pages when wording or context needs improvement.

Partner material and illustrations

Sponsored or partner material is labelled so readers can distinguish it from independent editorial work. Some illustrations may be AI-generated; where applicable, they are identified as such and are not presented as documentary evidence.